Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Diabetes-Related Stigma and Interpersonal Distress Among Adults with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study of Family, Workplace, and Healthcare Settings

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : sa, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Diabetes-related stigma is an underrecognized psychosocial factor that may contribute to emotional burden among individuals with diabetes. In Saudi Arabia, where the prevalence of diabetes is among the highest globally, limited evidence exists on how stigma across different social contexts influences interpersonal diabetes distress. We aimed to assess the association between diabetes-related stigma and interpersonal diabetes distress and to determine whether these associations differed across family, workplace, and healthcare stigma domains among adults with diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed survey data collected from 438 patients with diabetes. Diabetes-related stigma was measured using an adapted 12-item diabetes stigma scale covering family, workplace, and healthcare domains, while interpersonal diabetes distress was assessed using the Interpersonal Distress subscale of the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). The relationships between stigma and distress were estimated using multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, education level, years since diagnosis, and presence of complications. Results: Participants reported moderate levels of stigma (mean: 2.50, SD: 1.08) and interpersonal distress (mean: 2.31, SD: 1.23). Higher stigma scores were strongly associated with greater interpersonal distress (β = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.66). Domain-specific analysis showed that workplace (β = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.42) and healthcare stigma (β = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.38) were significantly associated with distress, while family stigma was not. Individuals with diabetes complications had higher distress (β = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.73). No evidence of effect modification by gender or education was observed. Spline models confirmed a positive and strengthening association at higher levels of stigma. Conclusions: Diabetes-related stigma is a strong and consistent factor associated with interpersonal diabetes distress in Saudi Arabia, with workplace and healthcare stigma demonstrating the strongest associations. These findings highlight the importance of addressing stigma within both social and healthcare environments and suggest that stigma reduction strategies may help alleviate the psychosocial burden associated with diabetes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Diabetes-Related Stigma and Interpersonal Distress Among Adults with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study of Family, Workplace, and Healthcare Settings
Date Crossref
15/06/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • King Saud University pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Department of Public Health pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • College of Nursing Community and Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Department pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

King Saud University, Department of Public Health et Community and Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Department — College of Nursing.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsChronic Disease Management Strategies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.