Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Exploratory Evaluation of Photon-Counting CT for Bone Marrow Edema Detection Across Multiple Joints: A Pilot Study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance and confidence of photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) for detecting bone marrow edema (BME) in trauma patients, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: In this exploratory, bone-region-level analysis, a selected pilot cohort of ten patients (mean age 56.2 years, 80% female) underwent both PCCT and MRI of peripheral joints within a 10-day interval. A total of 123 bone regions across the knee, pelvis/hip, wrist/hand, and elbow were analyzed. Two readers, blinded to clinical and MRI findings, independently assessed BME on PCCT using color-coded maps and standard images, recording diagnostic confidence on a 5-point Likert scale. MRI served as the reference for BME. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and interrater agreement (weighted Cohen's κ) were calculated. Results: BME was present in all patients and in 28.5% (35/123) of bone regions on MRI. For PCCT, Reader 1 achieved a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46-0.77), specificity of 0.97 (0.90-0.99), and accuracy of 0.87 (0.80-0.92) and Reader 2 achieved a sensitivity of 0.57 (0.41-0.72), specificity of 0.97 (0.91-0.99), and accuracy of 0.85 (0.78-0.91). Diagnostic specificity exceeded 0.93 across all joints, with the highest sensitivity in the knee. Inter-rater agreement was substantial (κ = 0.74). Both readers reported high diagnostic confidence. Reader 1 showed significantly higher confidence in correct classifications (p = 0.0017), whereas Reader 2 showed no significant difference between correct and incorrect classifications (p = 0.89). Conclusion: PCCT showed high specificity but only moderate sensitivity for BME detection at the bone-region level, particularly in large joints. These preliminary findings suggest that the high specificity of PCCT may support confirmation of BME in selected clinical scenarios when MRI is unavailable, contraindicated, or redundant. However, moderate sensitivity requires continued clinical vigilance and MRI confirmation for negative or equivocal findings. Larger validation studies are warranted. Key Points: · PCCT shows high specificity for bone marrow edema detection. · Moderate sensitivity of PCCT limits standalone clinical use. · First multi-joint bone-region evaluation in a selected cohort of mainly trauma patients. · Substantial interrater agreement supports feasibility. · Positive PCCT findings are highly specific for BME; negative findings require MRI confirmation. Citation Format: · Shahzadi I, Reimann G, Schneider C et al. Exploratory Evaluation of Photon-Counting CT for Bone Marrow Edema Detection Across Multiple Joints: A Pilot Study. Rofo 2026; DOI 10.1055/a-2888-7989.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Exploratory Evaluation of Photon-Counting CT for Bone Marrow Edema Detection Across Multiple Joints: A Pilot Study
Date Crossref
15/06/2026
Éditeur
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsHematological disorders and diagnostics

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.