Diverse Caregiver Perspectives on Sleep Health in School-aged Children: A Mixed-methods Study
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To explore sleep health knowledge, perspectives, and experiences in diverse caregivers of school-aged children receiving care from community health care centers to inform clinical practice. METHOD: Mixed-methods study including surveys and semistructured interviews with caregivers of school-aged children were conducted to provide understanding of their sleep beliefs, child sleep disturbances, and home sleep environment. Survey data (n = 19) were summarized descriptively and examined using Fisher exact tests. Qualitative data (n = 21) were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Survey data indicated a few caregiver misconceptions about sleep health, such as "Most school-aged children need about 8 hours of sleep per night," reported by 95% of caregivers and the belief that "If a child has trouble falling asleep, you should move their bedtime earlier," reported by 84% of caregivers. Four major qualitative themes were identified for caregivers: (1) perceptions of their child's sleep; (2) experiences in the primary care setting regarding their child's sleep health; (3) experiences searching for information about sleep; (4) needed information and resources to help support their child's sleep. CONCLUSION: Findings emphasize the need for (1) health care providers to integrate sleep health education into routine care and (2) the development of sleep health education for diverse caregivers of school-aged children.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Diverse Caregiver Perspectives on Sleep Health in School-aged Children: A Mixed-methods Study
- Date Crossref
- 15/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.