Genetic and biological determinants of pulmonary embolism: Insights from Mendelian randomization studies
Résumé fourni par la source
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially fatal thromboembolic disease contributing to a major global public health burden. Its pathogenesis involves multiple hemodynamic, inflammatory, metabolic, and genetic factors. The multifactorial nature of PE makes it difficult to infer the direct effects of risk factors using conventional statistical approaches because of potential confounding and reverse causality. Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to strengthen causal inference. This narrative review synthesizes the available MR literature concerning potential causative factors of PE, with particular emphasis on genetic and biological pathways. MR evidence suggests that matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-19 may be associated with increased PE susceptibility, whereas MMP-12 may be associated with decreased susceptibility. Impaired kidney function showed a positive association with PE risk, and reduced HLA-DR+ NK cell traits were linked to PE pathogenesis. Among gut microbiota, Clostridium innocuum was associated with increased PE risk, whereas Butyricicoccus and Actinobacteria showed protective associations. No consistent causal associations were identified for type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or epigenetic age acceleration. Larger multiethnic studies integrating multi-omics data are needed to clarify mechanisms underlying PE pathogenesis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Genetic and biological determinants of pulmonary embolism: Insights from Mendelian randomization studies
- Date Crossref
- 20/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.