Single-Cell and Spatial Omics Uncover Disease-Specific Synovial Landscapes in Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis
Résumé fourni par la source
At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2025 annual meeting in Bogotá, Columbia, Alexandra Khmelevskaya and Dr. Christopher Ritchlin presented a basic symposium on synovial immunopathology. They presented a comparative analysis between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Their multiomic studies revealed that RA is characterized by heightened intercellular signaling, particularly involving secreted phosphoprotein 1-positive (SPP1+) macrophages, chitinase-3-like protein 1-positive (CHI3L1+) fibroblasts, and fatty acid binding protein 5-positive inflammatory dendritic cell type 3 (FABP5+ iDC3]). Spatial transcriptomics confirmed direct, contact-dependent interactions between SPP1+ macrophages and iDC3 specifically in RA, whereas CHI3L1+ fibroblasts interacted with iDC3 through soluble mediators. Multiplex immunofluorescence validated the tissue localization of these subsets. In contrast, PsA was distinguished by transcriptionally activated CD8+ T cells in both synovium and peripheral blood, with open chromatin states indicating preactivation prior to tissue infiltration. These findings delineate RA-specific stromal-myeloid-dendritic cell networks and PsA-specific T-cell activation programs. Together, they underscore distinct immunopathogenic mechanisms and provide potential targets for precision therapeutics in inflammatory arthritis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics Uncover Disease-Specific Synovial Landscapes in Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis
- Date Crossref
- 15/06/2026
- Éditeur
- The Journal of Rheumatology
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.