Aller au contenu principal
2026 preprint

Liking but Not Approach Bias Differentiates Orthorexic Eating Behavior from Anorexia Nervosa in Responses to High-Caloric Healthy vs. High-Caloric Unhealthy Foods

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: The (pathological) fixation on healthy eating in individuals with orthorexia (OR) shares features with anorexia nervosa (AN), raising debate over whether OR constitutes a distinct disorder. A key distinction may lie in preference for and approach behaviour toward foods differing in calorie content and healthiness. We expected reduced liking and a stronger approach bias in AN and OR compared with controls; in AN specifically for high-caloric foods and in OR specifically for unhealthy foods. Methods: Individuals with self-reported AN diagnosis (N = 35), OR (high scores on the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale but no AN; N = 40), and controls (no eating disorder history, N = 101) completed liking ratings and an Approach-Avoidance Task with food stimuli varying in calorie content (high vs. low) and, for high-calorie items, healthiness (healthy vs. unhealthy). Results: Compared to controls, AN reported lower liking for all high-caloric foods, while OR reported lower liking only for high-caloric, unhealthy foods. Accordingly, OR also liked high-caloric healthy foods more than AN. AN showed weaker approach bias than controls (mainly driven by high-caloric unhealthy foods). OR descriptively lay between both other groups, with no significant differences in approach bias to either. Conclusion: Explicit liking ratings distinguished AN from OR aligning with their respective motivation to reduce high caloric versus unhealthy food intake. Reduced approach bias was specific to AN, possibly reflecting rapid engagement of approach-avoidance responses to easy-to-categorize high-caloric unhealthy foods. Contrary, health-focused processing in OR may require slower deliberations that are not captured by Approach-Avoidance Tasks.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral Health and Interventions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.