Farmers’ perceptions on climate change, variability and adaptation strategies in wheat-based farming systems of Northwest Ethiopia
Rattachement africain : Éthiopie, co, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Bread wheat production in high-altitude East African agro-ecosystems is confronted by both chronic institutional barriers and significant climatic warming. The adoption of climate-smart agriculture, farmer risk perceptions, and microclimatic dynamics in Northwest Ethiopia are all examined in this study. Mean yearly temperature rises of +1.19 °C in Debark and +1.61 °C in Dabat are revealed by long-term meteorological data (1981–2018). Smallholders perceive acute heat stress (33.0%) and soil deterioration (20.5%) as the main determinants of production, despite favorable historical rainfall trends. Adaptive behavior has a clear structural split according to a gender-disaggregated Multivariate Probit model. Capital-intensive inputs, such as inorganic fertilizers (β = +0.126, p < 0.05) and stress-tolerant seeds (β = +0.142, p < 0.05), are preferred by families headed by men. On the other hand, low-input intercropping is preferred by households headed by women due to severe labor and credit constraints (32.0% adoption rate (β = -0.108, p < 0.05). Severe gaps in climatic information (82.5%) and lack of access to extensions (63.0%) continue to limit adaptive agency. Advisory frameworks that are geographically focused, gender-responsive, and digitally connected are necessary to build smallholder resilience.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Farmers’ perceptions on climate change, variability and adaptation strategies in wheat-based farming systems of Northwest Ethiopia
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.