Elevated DNA insertion rate in Cyanophora paradoxa reveals unique repair signature
Résumé fourni par la source
Understanding mutation rate evolution is essential for elucidating evolutionary processes. To date, spontaneous mutation rates have been estimated in about 200 species, predominantly animals, plants, green algae, and bacteria. However, both mutation rates and spectra vary widely across the tree of life, and studies on new model species have recently provided valuable insights into the evolution of mutation rates. Here, we estimate the spontaneous mutation rate and spectrum in the glaucophyte Cyanophora paradoxa through a mutation accumulation experiment. Although its µ bs of 2 × 10 −10 mutations per site per generation is a typical value for a unicellular species, C. paradoxa exhibits highest insertion–deletion rate measured to date ( µ id = 2 × 10 −9 ). This high µ id is primarily driven by insertions in intergenic regions located within or adjacent to palindromes, inverted repeats (IRs), or direct repeats (DRs), sequence features known to promote noncanonical DNA structures and to act as mutation hotspots. Beyond its magnitude, the insertion spectrum displays a unique pattern of DR and double 3 nucleotide (nt) DR and IR repeats centered around CG nucleotides, likely generated by template switching and topoisomerase activity. This creates a positive feedback loop, further amplifying the insertion rate of C. paradoxa . These results highlight C. paradoxa ’s unique mutation patterns and position glaucophytes as key models for studying mutation processes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Elevated DNA insertion rate in <i>Cyanophora paradoxa</i> reveals unique repair signature
- Date Crossref
- 12/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.