Documenting Oral Health‐Related Life Experiences to Promote Positive Intergenerational Interactions

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: With the global rise in ageing populations, dental education must prepare students to care for older adults with empathy and competence. Ageism, defined as negative bias towards older individuals, can hinder quality care and meaningful dentist-patient relationships. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether documenting and narrating oral health-related life experiences of older adults could promote positive intergenerational attitudes and enhance empathy among dental students. METHODS: A reflective qualitative study was conducted among 3rd-year dental students enrolled in a Social and Behavioural Sciences module. A subgroup of students participated in an enhanced learning session that involved biographical interviews with older adults, focusing on their oral health journeys and related life stories. Students documented these narratives and produced reflective essays. Thematic analysis of the essays was performed to identify key domains of learning and professional development. RESULTS: Engagement with older adults' life stories fostered greater understanding of the psychosocial dimensions of ageing and oral health. Thematic analysis revealed enhanced empathy, improved communication skills and increased cultural sensitivity. Students recognized the importance of preparation, clear communication and digital tools for engagement. They also identified barriers such as financial constraints and access inequalities, demonstrating growing social awareness for older patients. CONCLUSION: Documenting and reflecting on oral health-related life experiences provided dental students with meaningful intergenerational learning opportunities that strengthened empathy, cultural sensitivity and readiness for geriatric dental care. Narrative-based reflection represents a valuable pedagogical tool to reduce ageist perceptions and promote inclusive care within dental education.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.