Conception Following Successful Repair of Acquired Gynatresia from Female Genital Cutting After Three Failed Attempts
Rattachement africain : Nigéria, au, gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Gynatresia, characterised by partial or complete obliteration of the vaginal canal, may be congenital or acquired. The acquired form remains more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, often following obstetric trauma, infection, or harmful traditional practices. We report the case of a nulliparous Nigerian woman in her early thirties who presented with a seven-year history of dyspareunia and infertility following female genital cutting in childhood. She had previously undergone three unsuccessful attempts at vaginal repair. Clinical evaluation confirmed acquired gynatresia, and she subsequently underwent successful vaginoplasty. Postoperatively, she experienced significant improvement in sexual function and overall quality of life. Eighteen months after surgery, she conceived spontaneously and was delivered of a healthy male infant at term via caesarean section. This case demonstrates that successful surgical correction of acquired gynatresia, even after multiple failed repairs, can restore vaginal patency and reproductive potential. It highlights the importance of specialised surgical care and long-term follow-up in affected women, particularly in resource-limited settings. There is need for longitudinal studies to better define fertility and obstetric outcomes following repair.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Conception Following Successful Repair of Acquired Gynatresia from Female Genital Cutting After Three Failed Attempts
- Date Crossref
- 23/03/2026
- Éditeur
- International Prime Publications Inc
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.