The AI Use Gap: Visibility Management of Generative AI Use in Higher Education in the Peruvian Andes

Le résumé fourni par la source

The study examines discrepancies between personally reported and declared use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) among university students from a public university located in the Peruvian Andes, operationalized as the AI Use Gap, an exploratory discrepancy indicator based on two self-reported measures. Drawing on a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, the study combines survey data (N = 150), experimental vignette evaluations, and qualitative follow-up interviews to explore how students manage the visibility and disclosure of AI use in academic contexts. Findings indicate relatively high levels of AI use alongside a consistent discrepancy between personally reported and declared use, suggesting patterns of differential reporting across contexts. Quantitative analyses did not show clearly differentiated exploratory relational patterns between the AI Use Gap and the psychosocial/contextual indicators examined, including perceived stigma, concealment, normative ambiguity, and peer pressure. Given the exploratory nature and limited internal consistency of the contextual indicators, these findings were interpreted cautiously as provisional exploratory patterns rather than as evidence of stable psychosocial relationships. Qualitative findings suggest that AI disclosure practices are shaped by socially evaluative and context-dependent processes, including fear of judgment, uncertainty regarding acceptable AI use, and selective disclosure strategies. Participants frequently described AI use as widespread but not consistently disclosed across academic settings. Overall, the findings suggest that discrepancies between AI use and disclosure may be better understood as forms of visibility management shaped by institutional ambiguity and social expectations rather than by stable individual-level characteristics alone. Rather than validating stable psychosocial mechanisms, the study explores an emerging and context-sensitive phenomenon using provisional contextual indicators intended to capture heterogeneous patterns of perception and disclosure. The study contributes to ongoing discussions regarding transparency, academic integrity, and the social regulation of AI use in higher education, particularly in under-researched Global South contexts.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.