Tuning the mechanical properties of polymer-based surrogate materials for articular cartilage and vocal fold repair
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The macroscopic biomechanical characteristics of soft and ultrasoft tissues, such as articular cartilage and vocal folds, significantly determine their physiological function. Treatments of widespread tissue degradations due to osteoarthritis in the knee or vocal fold impairment remain an unresolved challenge. For the design of implants for tissue repair after injury or disease, it is key to thoroughly understand the unique biomechanical properties of native tissues and potential substitute materials. We use multimodal mechanical testing methods combined with hyperelastic nonlinear continuum mechanics modeling, and finite element simulations to determine the macroscopic behavior of surrogate materials for human articular cartilage in the knee and human vocal folds. Our cyclic loading experiments reveal qualitative similarities for both tissues and their surrogates, including a nonlinear stress-strain behavior, hysteresis, and conditioning. We demonstrate the tunability of biomimetic and biosimilar stiffnesses of synthetic articular cartilage and vocal fold surrogates through tissue-specific process-material combinations. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of synthetic metamaterials in replicating essential passive biomechanical functions with great potential for future treatment options.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tuning the mechanical properties of polymer-based surrogate materials for articular cartilage and vocal fold repair
- Date Crossref
- 09/06/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.