Comparison of deuterium retention in EUROFER97 after gas and plasma loading
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Understanding the mechanisms governing tritium retention in structural materials is essential for ensuring both safety and tritium self-sufficiency in future fusion reactors. In this work, EURORFER97 samples were exposed either to a low energy electron-cyclotron-resonance deuterium (D) plasma or to D 2 gas at various temperatures. Post-exposure, D depth profiles within the first 7 μ m were measured using nuclear reaction analysis with a 3 He beam while thermal desorption spectroscopy was employed to determine the total retention and desorption behavior. Clear differences emerged between plasma and gas exposures: plasma loading resulted in a single dominant low-temperature desorption peak, whereas gas loading resulted in additional peaks at higher temperatures. These experimental results were simulated using a state-of-the-art reaction-diffusion code (TESSIM-X) to derived de-trapping energies and trapping barriers. The results indicate the presence of traps with high-energy barrier for entering the trap, whose occupation strongly depends on the solute D concentration. Additionally, re-polishing the sample surface after D 2 gas exposure significantly reduced the amplitude of the low-temperature desorption peak, while the high-temperature peak remained largely unchanged. These findings provide new insight into D behavior in reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels, with direct implications for tritium retention in reactor environments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of deuterium retention in EUROFER97 after gas and plasma loading
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2026
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.