No Difference Between Intramedullary Kirschner-Wires and Titanium Elastic Nails in Treating Pediatric Femur Fractures: Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Femur fractures are a common cause of disability of children in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). The introduction of flexible intramedullary nails improved the care of children with diaphyseal femoral fractures. Application of intramedullary nails is challenging in resource-limited settings due to implant cost and availability. Intramedullary Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation has been proposed as a low-cost alternative option for pediatric femur fractures. This study examines the non-inferiority of intramedullary K-wire to titanium elastic nail (TEN) for diaphyseal pediatric femur fractures. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed at a tertiary orthopaedic center in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Children (5-14 years) with acute diaphyseal femur fractures were randomly assigned to intramedullary K-wire or TEN fixation. The primary outcome was malunion. Secondary outcomes included modified RUST score (mRUST), PedsQL questionnaire, squat depth, and complications. Results: = .145). There were no statistically significant differences in PedsQL, squat depth, or clinical complications between groups. Conclusions: This study is the first prospective RCT assessing intramedullary K-wire versus TEN for the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures in Africa. No statistically significant difference was detected in malunion, radiographic union, functional outcomes, or patient/parent reported outcome measures between groups. Although this study did not achieve its target sample size and therefore cannot formally claim non-inferiority, non-inferiority was not established. A trend toward higher reoperation rates in the K-wire group (9% vs. 0%) warrants evaluation in adequately powered future trials. Intramedullary K-wires may be considered as an alternative implant when TEN is unavailable, but the current evidence is insufficient to support a recommendation of equivalence. Key Concepts: (1)Intramedullary K-wire fixation showed no statistically significant difference in rates of malunion, radiographic union, and functional outcomes compared to titanium elastic nails for pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures in a low-resource setting; however, the study was underpowered and non-inferiority was not formally established.(2)Two independent randomized controlled trials, conducted on two different continents, have found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between intramedullary K-wires and titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures, at a fraction of the implant cost, supporting their role as a viable alternative in resource-limited settings.(3)Although this study did not achieve its target sample size and therefore cannot formally claim non-inferiority, the results are consistent with K-wires being a safe and effective alternative to titanium elastic nails.(4)The substantial cost advantage of K-wires supports their use as a strategy to expand access to operative fixation in low- and middle-income countries.(5)Patient-reported and functional outcomes, including PedsQL quality-of-life scores and squat depth, showed no statistically significant difference between K-wire and titanium elastic nail groups at one-year follow-up; however, the study was underpowered, and these findings should be interpreted accordingly. Level of Evidence: Level I.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.