Laser-based therapies in the management of non-melanoma skin cancers: a narrative review
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The rising global incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) necessitates the exploration of tissue-sparing alternatives to surgical excision, which remains the gold standard. Laser systems (CO₂, Nd: YAG, PDL) offer a less invasive approach using selective photothermolysis, addressing functional and aesthetic concerns in anatomically sensitive areas. This narrative review summarizes the current clinical data on laser-based strategies for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), focusing on treatment parameters, patient/lesion selection, oncologic outcomes (clearance and recurrence), and safety. A targeted search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to May 2026 was synthesized narratively. For low-risk BCC, Nd: YAG lasers showed a 3.1% recurrence rate (7.9-year follow-up), while CO₂ lasers reported 9.4% (2.1-year follow-up). Pulsed dye laser (PDL) monotherapy was less reliable, with 38% recurrence. Evidence for cSCC remains limited, focusing on in situ disease and combined regimens. Integrating Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) and Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery (LADD) significantly improves oncologic efficacy and treatment depth. Laser therapy, particularly Nd: YAG and CO₂ systems, represents a viable tissue-sparing option primarily for low-risk BCC. However, evidence for cSCC remains limited and suggests higher recurrence rates, necessitating cautious patient selection.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Laser-based therapies in the management of non-melanoma skin cancers: a narrative review
- Date Crossref
- 06/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.