Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

1959-P: First Real-World Evaluation of CGM Outcomes during Ramadan Intermittent Fasting in Type 2 Diabetes Using the SYAI Sensor

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction and Objective: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems during Ramadan fasting is increasing among people with type 2 diabetes (PWT2D). We evaluated changes in CGM metrics from pre- to during Ramadan and whether pre-Ramadan CGM metrics predicted fasting success among high-risk PWT2D who attempted to fast while using the SYAI CGM sensor. Methods: Pre-Ramadan and Ramadan CGM data were reviewed for 64 PWT2D using insulin and/or sulfonylurea (SU) who attempted to fast during Ramadan 2025. Eligible participants had two months of CGM data (pre- and during Ramadan) and sensor active time ≥70%. A composite “fasting double target” was defined as breaking the fast because of diabetes on ≤2 days and achieving Ramadan TIR >70%. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of achieving the fasting double target Results: Glycemic control worsened from pre- to during Ramadan as follows: time in range (TIR) (67.68 to 62.38%, p<0.01); time above range (TAR>250) (8.57 to 11.18, p=0.01); Glycemia risk index (GRI) (32.82 to 39.49, p<0.01), and average glucose (165.85 to 173 mg/dl, p<0.01). No significant changes were noted in TBR, TAR>180, or coefficient of variation. Only 45% of PWT2D achieved the fasting double target. Participants who achieved the fasting double target had better pre-Ramadan CGM metrics than those who did not (TIR: 83.68 vs 54.58, p<0.01; GRI: 16.25 vs 46.39, p<0.01; average glucose: 141.63 vs 185.67, p<0.01; GMI: 6.72 vs 7.95, p<0.01; and TAR>180: 13.66 vs 32.48, p<0.01; and TAR>250: 1.62 vs 14.25, p<0.01). After adjusting for age, sex, employment/insurance status, educational level, age at diabetes diagnosis, and diabetes duration; pre-Ramadan TIR>70% and GRI ≤20 were strongly associated with achieving the fasting double target Conclusion: Among high-risk PWT2D using insulin and/or SU, glycemic control worsened during Ramadan fasting. Pre-Ramadan TIR and GRI were strongly associated with successful fasting, highlighting the importance of CGM-guided risk stratification and counseling before Ramadan Disclosure M.E. Al-Sofiani: Speaker's Bureau; Ended; Medtronic, Dexcom, Inc. Research Support; Current; Dexcom, Inc. Research Support; Ended; Medtronic. Speaker's Bureau; Ended; Insulet Corporation, Abbott Diabetes, Sanofi. H. Albalawi: None. S.K. Alharthi: None. F. Alam: None. A.S. Alangri: None. K.H. Aburisheh: None.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
1959-P: First Real-World Evaluation of CGM Outcomes during Ramadan Intermittent Fasting in Type 2 Diabetes Using the SYAI Sensor
Date Crossref
05/06/2026
Éditeur
American Diabetes Association
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Dietary Effects on HealthDiet and metabolism studiesBerberine and alkaloids research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.