Moderate Root-Zone Cooling Improves Vegetative Growth and Reduces Open-Center Malformation in Standard Chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ During Summer
Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
High summer temperatures can reduce growth and flower quality in standard chrysanthemum, while whole-greenhouse cooling requires substantial energy input. This study evaluated whether localized root-zone cooling could improve growth and suppress open-center malformed capitula in standard chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ while considering energy use. Rooted cuttings were grown in a commercial hydroponic greenhouse during summer and subjected to a non-cooled control (NC) or root-zone cooling activation thresholds of 28 °C (HT), 25 °C (MT), or 22 °C (LT). Root-zone temperature, vegetative growth, gas exchange, flower quality, open-center incidence, and electricity consumption were measured. Mean root-zone temperatures were 27.8 °C in NC, 26.6 °C in HT, 24.4 °C in MT, and 23.3 °C in LT. Root-zone cooling improved vegetative growth, particularly stem diameter and shoot and root biomass, whereas leaf-level gas-exchange parameters were not consistently affected. Open-center incidence was highest in NC (67%) and was reduced to 33%, 11%, and 33% in HT, MT, and LT, respectively. Electricity consumption was 321, 783, and 1088 kWh bed−1 in HT, MT, and LT, respectively. These results indicate that moderate root-zone cooling, particularly MT, provides a practical balance between flower quality and energy use for summer chrysanthemum production.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Moderate Root-Zone Cooling Improves Vegetative Growth and Reduces Open-Center Malformation in Standard Chrysanthemum ‘Baekgang’ During Summer
- Date Crossref
- 05/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.