Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Moderate-to-severe preterm brain injury (PBI), including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), remains an important cause of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Early risk stratifi-cation using routinely collected clinical data may help prioritize surveillance in vul-nerable infants. Methods: We retrospectively included 318 preterm infants admitted between 2015 and 2024 as the development cohort. Thirty-three candidate predictors derived from perinatal factors, first laboratory tests within 24 h of admission, and se-lected early hospitalization variables were evaluated. Seven machine-learning algo-rithms were developed using stratified 10 × 5 nested cross-validation with prespecified preprocessing, class-balancing, and feature-selection procedures. Candidate models were compared primarily using the mean fold-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After model selection, the finalized LightGBM model was calibrated using Platt scaling, and its pooled out-of-fold (OOF) performance was summarized. Two prespecified thresholds (Youden and high-sensitivity) were used for risk stratification. A small independent temporal cohort of 35 infants was used for preliminary external validation. Results: PBI occurred in 62/318 infants (19.5%) in the development cohort and 6/35 infants (17.1%) in the temporal external cohort. During candidate-model comparison, LightGBM achieved the highest mean fold-level AU-ROC (0.768, 95% CI 0.708–0.825). The finalized 14-feature LightGBM model, evaluated using pooled OOF predictions after Platt calibration, yielded an AUROC of 0.747 (95% CI 0.679–0.811), a PR-AUC of 0.392, and a Brier score of 0.136. At the Youden threshold (0.18), sensitivity was approximately 0.70 and specificity approximately 0.85; at the high-sensitivity threshold (0.10), sensitivity was approximately 0.95 and specificity approximately 0.50. Key predictors included ventilation status and early physiologic and laboratory indicators. In the small temporal external cohort, the AUROC was 0.897 (95% CI 0.672–1.000), but the confidence interval was wide and calibration was suboptimal, indicating that this external assessment should be considered preliminary. Conclusions: We developed an interpretable LightGBM model using routinely avail-able early postnatal and early hospitalization data to support risk stratification for PBI in preterm infants. The model showed moderate internal discrimination and a positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Preliminary temporal external valida-tion yielded highly uncertain estimates; larger multicenter cohorts are needed to con-firm generalizability, refine calibration, and determine the appropriate role of the model in early PBI risk assessment before clinical use.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period
Date Crossref
03/06/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchInfant Development and Preterm Care

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.