Normativity of Culturally-Specific Discipline Practices and Linkages to Caregiver-Child Relationship Quality in Sierra Leone.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose: In Sierra Leone, violent discipline has been rarely studied, although it has been shown to predict poor outcomes elsewhere. Our purpose was to examine which discipline practices a sample of vulnerable Sierra Leonean caregivers are willing to use and their associations with caregiver-child relationship quality. Method: = 113 pairs of caregivers and their 9-to-13-year-old children around Bo, Sierra Leone, who were enrolled in a program for families at risk of separation. Descriptive statistics and item response theory analysis examined caregivers' willingness to use discipline practices and their normativity among caregivers. Pearson's correlations examined discipline and relationship quality; multiple linear regression did the same while controlling for demographics. Results: Caregivers were most willing to hit a child with an object or hand and least willing to ignore the child, withhold food, or use pain-causing punishments like "knee-walking." The violent discipline scale predicted worse attachment and caregiver-reported violent discipline predicted worse rejection. The IRT analysis revealed that the discipline practices that reflected a higher latent severity of the discipline construct (e.g., ignoring) were those that were more strongly associated with poor relationship quality, whereas highly normative practices (e.g., beating with an object) exhibited weaker associations. Conclusions: Our study uncovered the prevalence of several discipline methods used in Sierra Leone but rarely included in Western-derived measures. Parenting interventions aimed at improving child and family outcomes should particularly discourage ignoring, shaming, and pain-causing punishments. Policymakers should also consider addressing psychological aggression and emotional abuse in child rights legislation rather than corporal punishment alone.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.