Effect of perceived stress on sleep quality in Chinese graduate students: the chain mediating role of anxiety and sleep procrastination
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background In recent years, with the acceleration of the pace of modern life and the increase of life pressure, the prevalence of poor sleep quality has risen substantially among young people. Insufficient sleep and insomnia have emerged as a serious public issue in modern society. This study aimed to investigate the effect of perceived stress on sleep quality, with particular focus on the mediating roles of anxiety and sleep procrastination in the stress-sleep quality relationship. Methods A total of 2,486 Chinese graduate students participated in the questionnaire survey, which used the Perceived Stress Scale, the Bedtime Procrastination Scale, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, and the Self-rating Anxiety Scale. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and the bootstrap method were utilized for data analysis. Results The findings revealed a 37.8% prevalence of sleep disturbances among the participants. Notably, the mediating effects of anxiety and sleep procrastination in the association between perceived stress and sleep quality were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Conclusion The results showed that higher perceived stress was positively associated with greater anxiety, which further contributed to sleep procrastination, and ultimately correlated with poorer sleep quality.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effect of perceived stress on sleep quality in Chinese graduate students: the chain mediating role of anxiety and sleep procrastination
- Date Crossref
- 02/06/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.