Fuzzy-Guided Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Traffic Signal Control
Rattachement africain : rs, cz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Traffic signal control over urban networks requires coordinating the controllers of multiple signalized intersections toward a shared goal of minimizing network-wide congestion. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods have shown considerable promise in this setting. The epsilon–greedy exploration strategy adopted by many of these methods treats every candidate signal phase as equally worth trying, discarding the rich domain knowledge that traffic theory already provides. This paper proposes fuzzy-guided exploration, in which a multi-criteria fuzzy inference system uses local traffic conditions, with phase pressure as its primary input, to assign each candidate phase a priority. These priorities define a sampling distribution used in place of the uniform draw. We evaluate the method across four MARL algorithms covering independent learning (IQL) and the centralized training with decentralized execution paradigm (VDN, QMIX, and QPLEX) on both a synthetic grid and a real-world network. Fuzzy-guided exploration consistently improves upon the baseline in all combinations, with tangible gains on the synthetic grid and substantially larger improvements on the real-world network. These findings demonstrate that exploration is an effective intervention point for domain-knowledge integration in cooperative MARL, and that pressure-based scoring provides a well-suited signal to serve that role in traffic signal control.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fuzzy-Guided Exploration for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Traffic Signal Control
- Date Crossref
- 02/06/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.