Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Efficacy of home treatment and inpatient treatment for children and adolescents in psychiatric crisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Inpatient treatment is widely used for children and adolescents in psychiatric crisis but may disrupt family life and routines. Home treatment offers a less restrictive alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared both approaches regarding psychopathology, family functioning, psychosocial functioning, and readmissions, considering post-treatment vs. follow-up effects and sequential vs. stand-alone models. Following PRISMA 2020, systematic searches were conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycInfo, and trial registries. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where feasible, and certainty of evidence was rated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023458888). Fifteen studies (N = 617 participants) were included, with eleven contributing to meta-analyses. No significant differences were found between HT and IT for psychopathology, psychosocial functioning, or readmissions. A significant subgroup difference between post-treatment and follow-up was observed for psychosocial functioning (p = 0.0058), with inpatient treatment showing short-term advantages and HT more favorable outcomes at follow-up. Effects on psychopathology were small and non-significant, and readmission rates did not differ (risk ratio (RR) = 1.27, 95% CI [0.93-1.74]). Evidence on sequential models and family functioning was limited and showed no clear superiority of either approach. HT appears comparable to IT and may offer more sustained improvements in psychosocial functioning. Due to the limited quality of the included studies, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Efficacy of home treatment and inpatient treatment for children and adolescents in psychiatric crisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Date Crossref
01/06/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Psychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.