Cytogenetic studies in Cannabis sativa: endoreduplication and mixoploidy during the cell cycle (Supplementary material)

Résumé fourni par la source

The supplementary material for the manuscript Cytogenetic studies in Cannabis sativa: endoreduplication and mixoploidy during the cell cycle contains the following items: Figure S1. Boxplots showing the distribution of cycle value (A) and endocycle index values (B) across three analyzed organs (root, cotyledon, and leaf) of Cannabis sativa. Figure S2. Plots showing the distribution of cycle value (A, C) and endocycle index (B, D) in the three studied organs of Cannabis sativa (root, cotyledon and leaf). Colors represent the three domestication statuses (A, B; wild-growing, landrace and cultivar) and type of accessions (C, D; wild-growing, drug, fiber). Minimum and maximum values are indicated for each accession, while individuals are shown as points. Table S1. Counts and percentages of nuclei with 2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, and 32C DNA contents, together with mean, SD, cycle value, and endocycle index calculations for root, cotyledon, and leaf samples of Cannabis sativa. Table S2. Post hoc Dunn tests with Bonferroni correction comparing organs of Cannabis sativa (root, cotyledon, and leaf) for cycle value and endocycle index data. Table S3. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test among phylogeographic groups (Caucasus and Mediterranean, Indoafrica, C & S China and Himalayas, and Eurosiberia and Mongolia) for cycle value and endocycle index datasets in each organ (root, cotyledon, and leaf) of Cannabis sativa. Table S4. Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests among domestication statuses of Cannabis sativa accessions (wild-growing, landrace, and cultivar) for cycle value and endocycle index data in each organ (root, cotyledon, and leaf). Table S5. Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum tests among accession types of Cannabis sativa (wild-growing, fiber, and drug) for cycle value and endocycle index data in each organ (root, cotyledon, and leaf).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.