The actively secreted plasma extracellular vesicle troponin (ASPECT) study: circulating troponin in extracellular vesicles across cardiovascular disease cohorts
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cardiac troponin is essential for diagnosing myocardial infarction, yet high-sensitivity assays frequently detect troponin elevations in non-ischemic contexts, complicating clinical decision-making. We investigated extracellular vesicle-associated (EV) versus non-vesicular (NEV) troponin in plasma samples from 266 participants across acute and chronic heart failure, type 1 and type 2 MI, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, end-stage kidney disease, healthy individuals, and exercise states. EV troponin was negligible in necrosis-dominant conditions (MI, kidney disease) but constituted up to 40-60% of total troponin in chronic heart failure or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; in healthy controls and athletes, troponin concentrations were near or below the detection limit, though detectable troponin was predominantly EV-associated. Unlike plasma troponin, EV troponin weakly correlated with natriuretic peptides or renal indices, suggesting a distinct release mechanism linked to chronic stress or physiological processes. These findings highlight the potential for EV troponin to distinguish active, non-necrotic processes from acute injury. Further study may clarify its prognostic utility and refine current diagnostics and risk stratification.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The actively secreted plasma extracellular vesicle troponin (ASPECT) study: circulating troponin in extracellular vesicles across cardiovascular disease cohorts
- Date Crossref
- 29/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.