Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Responsible AI-Assisted Digital Harm Screening and Referral in Clinical Mental Health Counseling: A Conceptual Framework for College Student Well-Being

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Clinical mental health departments are increasingly asked to respond to student anxiety, depression, cyberbullying, online harassment, reputational injury, and digitally mediated conflict while also evaluating whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools can improve access, triage, documentation, and referral. This article develops a responsible AI-assisted digital harm screening and referral framework for clinical mental health counseling, with a specific focus on college student well-being. Using a conceptual narrative review design, the article synthesizes counseling ethics, AI governance, digital harm literature, and responsible decision-support scholarship. The central argument is that AI may support counselors by organizing intake information, identifying patterns that require human attention, and improving workflow consistency; however, AI must not replace clinical judgment, crisis assessment, informed consent, cultural responsiveness, or the therapeutic relationship. The proposed SAFE-CMH framework includes six dimensions: Screening and symptom context, Accountability and informed consent, Fairness and bias control, Escalation and human oversight, Community prevention education, and Mental health outcome monitoring. The framework is informed by the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics, the National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework, World Health Organization AI-for-health guidance, and a limited selection of highly relevant research by Ebenezer Amakeh and colleagues on digital misconduct, ethical AI governance, and AI-supported organizational decision-making. The article concludes that responsible AI in clinical mental health should be implemented as a supervised decision-support layer, not as an autonomous therapist or disciplinary investigator. A phased implementation and evaluation plan is provided for counseling departments seeking to adopt AI-enabled tools while protecting confidentiality, client rights, safety, equity, and professional accountability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Behavioral Health Network pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Behavioral Health Network.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDigital Mental Health InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.