A Natural ≳100× Telescope: Discovery of the Strongly Lensed Type II SN 2025mkn at z = 1.37
Rattachement africain : se, gb, de, us, fr, it, mx, es, bo, ca, kr, ye, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We present the discovery of SN 2025mkn, a gravitationally lensed Type II supernova. First detected as a blue transient in Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), 0 . ″ 83 from a z = 0.42 elliptical galaxy, the follow-up SNIFS/UH2.2 m and LRIS/Keck spectra revealed absorption lines at z = 1.371. Later JWST NIRCam imaging shows that the bright transient is a close pair of point sources separated by ∼ 0 . ″ 07 , and a 30 times fainter counterimage opposite the lens, for which NIRSpec reveals strong H α emission also at z = 1.371. The lightcurves and spectra are consistent with the Type II supernova source being magnified ≳100 times, with ∼250 required to reconcile its luminosity with that of nearby events such as SN 2023ixf. Lens models are consistent with such high magnifications, and always show that the faint image arrived first (undetected in earlier ZTF imaging), consistent with the later spectral phase of this fainter image. A fourth image is also predicted and possibly detected in the NIRSpec data. Lightcurve-based time-delay measurements are not possible due to the first image being the faintest; however, the resolved NIRSpec spectra offer a future opportunity for time-delay cosmography through supernova phase measurements.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- A Natural ≳100× Telescope: Discovery of the Strongly Lensed Type II SN 2025mkn at <i>z</i> = 1.37
- Date Crossref
- 29/05/2026
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.