Impact of Removing Restrictive Haemoglobin A1C Eligibility Criteria for Insulin Pump Therapy Funding for Children With Type 1 Diabetes in Ontario, Canada

Le résumé fourni par la source

AIMS: In Ontario, publicly funded insulin pump therapy has been available to children with Type 1 diabetes since 2006. Before 31 March 2022, eligibility required three Haemoglobin A1c (A1C) measurements in the preceding year, with the two most recent < 10%. On 1 April 2022, this criterion was removed. We assessed whether this policy change reduced socioeconomic disparities in pump access among new applicants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study including all children in Ontario who applied for insulin pump funding from program inception to 31 March 2024. The primary exposure was the time period (pre- vs. post-policy change). The outcome was social disadvantage, measured using a five-level neighbourhood index. Ordinal logistic regression with generalised estimating equations (accounting for neighbourhood clustering) estimated the odds of greater disadvantage post-policy, adjusting for age, sex and diabetes duration. Segmented regression assessed changes over time in differences in application proportions between the most and least disadvantaged quintiles. RESULTS: A total of 7540 children applied pre-policy and 1311 post-policy. The mean A1C at application was similar between time periods (8.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.0002). Adjusted odds of greater disadvantage were higher post-policy (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.18-1.47). The difference in applications between the most versus least disadvantaged quintile decreased by 0.13%/quarter (95% CI: -0.22 to -0.05) pre-policy and by 1.64%/quarter (95% CI: -8.3 to 5.0) post-policy, though the pre versus post-policy difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Removal of A1C-based eligibility may improve equity in paediatric insulin pump access, though longer follow-up is needed.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.