Aller au contenu principal
2026 conference-abstract

Tobacco use–driven lung cancer mortality in the United States: A population-based analysis from 2003 to 2023.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : in, pk, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

e20039 Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with tobacco use as its primary risk factor. Despite advances in detection and treatment, smoking-related disease continues to impose a heavy burden. This study examines LC mortality disparities, trends, and geographic variation among tobacco users in the United States from 2003 to 2023. Methods: Using the CDC WONDER database for adults aged ≥25, we analyzed age-adjusted and crude mortality rates (AAMRs and CMRs) per 100,000 for LC (ICD-10: C34) among patients with tobacco use (ICD-10: F17) by year, sex, race/ethnicity, and geography. Joinpoint regression estimated average annual percentage change (AAPC) and annual percentage change (APC) with 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: During the study, an overall burden of 3,148,638 deaths was observed due to LC, among which 1,222,199 cases were attributed to tobacco use as a contributory cause, most occurring at the Decedent's home. The overall AAMR rose from 12.79 in 2003 to 19.25 in 2023 (AAPC: 1.94%; p<0.001), with significant increases in 2003–2005 (APC: 34.15, 95% CI: 22.16 to 47.32) and notable recent declines in 2016–2023 (APC: -4.97, 95% CI: -5.79 to -4.15). Men consistently had higher AAMR than women, nearly double in 2003 (17.33 vs. 9.50), and the disparity persisted in 2023 (23.19 vs. 16.00). Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites had the highest AAMR, rising 2.49% annually (p<0.001), while NH Asians or Pacific islanders had the lowest with a 1.92% annual increase (p=0.05). Regionally, the Midwest experienced the fastest rise in AAMR at 4% annually (p<0.001), while the West had the lowest AAMR. Mortality in rural areas (AAMR 34.14) rose rapidly (4.37%; p<0.001) than in urban populations (23.75; 2.93%). Vermont and Oregon ranked highest in the top 90th percentile. Conclusions: Tobacco use-driven LC mortality has risen overall, with declines in more recent years. However, disparities in outcomes remain prevalent, underscoring the urgent need for health service initiatives, including tobacco cessation education, lung cancer screening, and telehealth platforms, to improve access to care for affected populations. Deaths and AAPC for trends related to LC among tobacco users from 2003 to 2023. Variable Deaths AAPC (2003-2023) with CI Overall 1,222,199 1.95 (0.89 to 3.01) Male 695,442 1.40 (0.38 to 2.43) Female 526,757 2.46 (1.05 to 4.00) NH White 1,064,773 2.46 (1.37 to 3.56) NH Black 10,8178 1.56 (-0.29 to 3.43) NH American Indian or Alaska Native 7,175 0.68 (-2.10 to 3.53) Hispanic 29,258 -1.34 (-2.71 to 0.04) NH Asians 12,815 1.93 (-0.08 to 3.97) Midwest 371,508 4.01 (1.86 to 6.21) West 163,612 -0.52 (-1.70 to 0.67) South 450,020 1.43 (0.48 to 2.40) Northeast 237,059 1.33 (-0.16 to 2.85)

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Tobacco use–driven lung cancer mortality in the United States: A population-based analysis from 2003 to 2023.
Date Crossref
01/06/2026
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Smoking Behavior and CessationCancer Risks and FactorsGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.