Quantitative LC-MS/MS profiling reveals aberrant chondroitin sulfate in Alzheimer’s disease
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is an essential sulfated glycan in the brain, but standard LC-MS/MS disaccharide analysis provides only limited quantitative accuracy for detecting CS structural changes under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Here, we incorporated eight distinct 13C-labeled CS disaccharide calibrants into the analytical workflow. Using this enhanced approach, we identified structural alterations in both sulfation patterns and total CS abundance in pre-clinical and clinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain samples compared with controls. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from AD patients further revealed elevated levels of the CS-E disaccharide and reduced levels of hyaluronic acid. Functionally, we found that synthetic CS-E 19-mer—but not other synthetic CS 19-mer subtypes—impaired neuronal growth, underscoring the need to pinpoint specific CS structures that contribute to neurodegeneration. Because CS abnormalities are detectable in the pre-clinical AD brain, our findings raise the possibility that CS glycans could serve as early biomarkers for AD. A specific and sensitive LC-MS/MS-based method was employed to identify structural and quantitative alterations in chondroitin sulfate glycans from human brain samples, providing a potential diagnostic biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Quantitative LC-MS/MS profiling reveals aberrant chondroitin sulfate in Alzheimer’s disease
- Date Crossref
- 28/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.