GWAS of extended prescription analgesic use identifies genetic loci in chronic pain
Rattachement africain : gb, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pain-related conditions are the leading cause of disability worldwide. Existing GWAS for chronic pain have mainly focused on individual pain-related disorders, which may not optimally capture the phenotype. Here, we define chronic pain based on prescription analgesic use ( ≥ 90 days) in two large biobanks (UK Biobank and FinnGen). GWAS meta-analyses of 11 prescription-based pain phenotypes identify 140 associations with chronic pain, including 78 novel (e.g. ARPP21, CNTNAP2) and 62 previously reported (e.g. SLC39A8, DCC, TRPM8) associations. Integrating these genetic associations with functional data including transcriptome-wide association studies, cell-type and pathway enrichment, and gene enrichment in mouse phenotypes identifies potential mechanisms involved in chronic pain, implicating oligodendrocyte differentiation, neuronal guidance, endolysosomal function and post-synaptic endosome recycling. Our study showcases how the use of prescription data to identify and characterize pain can provide insights into pain genetics and its underlying biology. Analyses of chronic pain have traditionally focused on people with pain-related disorders, excluding those without a specific condition. To avoid this, Harlow et al. perform a GWAS meta-analysis of chronic pain defined based on the use of analgesics.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- GWAS of extended prescription analgesic use identifies genetic loci in chronic pain
- Date Crossref
- 28/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.