Aller au contenu principal
2026 conference-abstract

Five-year survival disparities in two population-based cohorts of adults with early-onset colorectal cancer.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

11155 Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) is now the leading cause of cancer-related death in those under the age of 50 despite advances in treatment. However, the impact of specific sociodemographic and clinical factors on long-term survival remains poorly characterized. We evaluated 5-year survival patterns and risk factors across two diverse, population-based cohorts to optimize risk reduction strategies and survivorship care delivery. Methods: We constructed two cohorts of adults < 50 years of age with newly diagnosed EO-CRC from 2015 to 2018 (stages I-III) and treated with curative-intent surgery. One cohort was derived from three SEER registries (Georgia, Los Angeles County, Kentucky; n = 2995) and one cohort was derived from the Veteran’s Health Administration (VHA) (n = 295). Pathologic-confirmed recurrence was identified in the follow-up period 6 months to five years after curative-intent surgery via human review of electronic pathology reports. Five-year survival was estimated from the date of curative-intent surgery to five years post-surgery. Adjusted risk of CRC-specific mortality was estimated in both populations using multivariable proportional hazards regression, adjusting for key demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: The proportion of patients surviving 5 years was 86% in the SEER cohort and 92% in the VHA cohort. Overall, 14% experienced recurrence in SEER and 18% in VHA, and recurrence was strongly associated with reduced survival in both cohorts (both p < 0.01). Five-year survival varied by clinical stage and was higher in the VHA across all stages (SEER: 93% stage I, 87% stage II, and 76% stage III vs. VHA: 97% stage I, 93% stage II, and 88% stage III). Mortality risk varied by race/ethnicity in the SEER cohort only: Hispanic patients (adjusted HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2) and Black patients (adjusted HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5–2.5) had a greater risk of 5-year mortality vs. white patients. Age at diagnosis, sex, and living in a rural area were not significantly associated with mortality in either cohort. Rectal tumors (vs. colon) were associated with an increased risk of mortality in VHA (adjusted HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.0-6.4), but not in SEER. Lymphovascular invasion was associated with an increased risk of mortality in both cohorts. Conclusions: There are critical sociodemographic and clinical disparities in survival among adults with stage I-III EO-CRC. These distinct patterns observed between the two cohorts underscore the influence of varying population-level risk profiles. Tailoring survivorship care to identify and support these high-risk subgroups is essential to mitigate disparities and improve long-term outcomes in this growing patient population.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Five-year survival disparities in two population-based cohorts of adults with early-onset colorectal cancer.
Date Crossref
01/06/2026
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.