Epstein–Barr virus-specific T-cells in pediatric liver transplant recipients
Résumé fourni par la source
To determine Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific T-cell responses after pediatric liver transplantation (LT), we monitored EBV viral load and IFNγ-producing specific T-cells reacting to BZLF1, EBNA1, and LMP2 antigens from peripheral immune cells before LT until 48 weeks after LT. Among forty children, seven (17.5%) developed EBV infection. Two were subsequently diagnosed with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. The infected children exhibited fewer EBNA1-specific CD4 + T-cells and CD8 + T-cells before LT (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) than non-infected children. At 32 weeks after LT, EBNA1-specific CD4 + T-cells, LMP2-specific CD4 + T-cells, and BZLF1-specific CD8 + T-cells were lower in the infected children (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). EBV infection-free survival rates (IFSR) were higher in groups with detected EBNA1-specific CD4 + or CD8 + T-cells prior to LT compared to non-detected group. No patients with detected EBNA1-specific CD8 + T-cells reported EBV infection after LT (a 48-week IFSR of 100%). However, the differences of IFSR were statistically insignificant (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.3, and HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.09 to 1.86, respectively). LMP2-specific CD4 + T-cells were negatively correlated with EBV viral load (r = - 0.702, P = 0.02). In conclusion, EBV infection after pediatric LT is associated with lower expression of EBV-specific T-cells, which may be potential predictors for the infection after LT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epstein–Barr virus-specific T-cells in pediatric liver transplant recipients
- Date Crossref
- 26/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.