Very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in treatment-naïve women with endometrial cancer and overweight: a randomized feasibility study
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial (NCT03285152) evaluates the primary endpoint of feasibility of a very-low carbohydrate diet (VLCD) in 19 women with obesity/overweight and endometrial cancer, who are randomized 2:1 to either a VLCD or a standard diet for 21–28 days. Fifteen participants complete the study, with 91 ± 4% of VLCD meals consumed, 5.5 ± 0.8% weight lost, and no grade 3/4 adverse events. Secondary endpoints include assessments of tumor biology and circulating metabolic biomarkers. Fasting glucose and insulin fall 22 ± 5.9% and 60 ± 3.8%, while total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) rise 6 ± 2.7% and 17.8 ± 8.9%. In a pre-specified exploratory outcome, RNA-Seq shows enrichment of CD8 + T-cells (q < 0.034; NES > 1.75), confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) showing CD8 + T-cells infiltration of the tumor margins (q = 0.034; NES = 1.75). We conclude that VLCD is feasible and well-tolerated. Dietary interventions have been proposed as potential therapeutic strategies in cancer. Here, the authors report a feasibility randomized clinical trial comparing standard diet with a very lowcarbohydrate ketogenic diet (VLCD) in treatment-naive women with endometrial cancer and obesity or overweight.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Very low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in treatment-naïve women with endometrial cancer and overweight: a randomized feasibility study
- Date Crossref
- 27/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.