Investigating the Differences in the Simple Reaction Time and Muscle Stiffness Between Gym Users and Open-Skills Sport Practitioners: An Exploratory Study
Résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: The number of people who practice gym activities is increasing. Most gym activities take place within a building, and the movements are controlled, making them closed-skill activities. This could decrease the processing speed capacity. The objective was to investigate whether a difference, assessed by a simple reaction time and muscle stiffness task, exists between people who practice gym versus open-skills sports activities. Methods: A total of 58 gym users and open-skills sport practitioners were recruited. Participants’ anthropometric characteristics were evaluated. Electrodes were set at the tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL), and participants performed the simple reaction time task. A drop jump test (muscular stiffness) was also executed. A multiple comparison test was adopted to study the differences between groups for FAT%, reaction time, and ground contact time. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Data from the groups presented no statistically significant differences in the simple reaction time task (p = 0.999) and in the drop jump (p = 0.999), or from a superficial electromyography point of view. Conclusions: This exploratory study detected no statistically significant differences between the groups. The study design does not support equivalence conclusions. Further studies are required to understand the topic in depth.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Investigating the Differences in the Simple Reaction Time and Muscle Stiffness Between Gym Users and Open-Skills Sport Practitioners: An Exploratory Study
- Date Crossref
- 26/05/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.