Ecological momentary assessment of cognitive functioning among older adults: The relationship between self-reported and test-based cognitive functioning
Rattachement africain : be, fi. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: The use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to measure within-person fluctuations in cognitive performance has increased in recent years. However, many of the measures employed lack strong methodological foundations. This study evaluated the within-person reliability of test-based and self-reported momentary cognitive assessments and examined associations between test-based and self-reported momentary cognitive functioning, among older adults. Method: Fifty-four participants (aged 65+) completed a 10-day testing period, during which they completed three assessments daily, measuring self-reported (three items) and test-based (1-back test and spatial dot memory test) cognitive functioning on a smartphone. Within-person reliability was evaluated by examining measurement variability within and across assessments. Associations between self-reported and test-based momentary cognitive functioning were analyzed using general(ized) linear mixed models. Results: Among the momentary measures, the self-report items, 1-back test response time, and spatial dot memory test response time demonstrated adequate within-person reliability, while spatial dot memory test accuracy exhibited low reliability. Self-reported momentary cognitive functioning was only significantly associated with the spatial dot memory test span. Conclusions: Establishing within-person reliability is crucial when selecting cognitive assessments in EMA research. Furthermore, momentary measures of test-based and self-reported cognitive functioning were not consistently associated and should not be used interchangeably. Beyond the empirical findings, this study highlights key practical lessons for cognitive EMA research, including the need to consider practice effects, task difficulty, the number of trials, and the outcomes that are used.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ecological momentary assessment of cognitive functioning among older adults: The relationship between self-reported and test-based cognitive functioning
- Date Crossref
- 25/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Ghent University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Laurea University of Applied Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Vrije Universiteit Brussel pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Movement and Sports Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy Department of Movement and Sport Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Ghent University, Laurea University of Applied Sciences et Vrije Universiteit Brussel, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.