Early belimumab accelerates renal response and reduces glucocorticoid exposure in lupus nephritis: a multicentre propensity-matched study

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: International guidelines recommend early combination of standard therapy with innovative agents in lupus nephritis (LN) to prevent kidney damage. Whether this accelerates renal response is unclear. We aimed to compare renal response trajectories, predictors and glucocorticoid (GC) burden in LN patients receiving early belimumab plus standard-of-care (SoC) vs SoC alone. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with biopsy-proven LN treated with belimumab plus SoC as initial therapy were enrolled from Italian lupus referral centres and compared with a historical SoC cohort (1990-2016). Data were collected at baseline and during follow-up. Propensity score matching based on baseline proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, standard initial treatment and histological class led to comparable groups. Complete renal response (CRR) was defined per 2019 EULAR/EDTA. Cox regression was used to assess predictors. RESULTS: Ninety-one belimumab patients were matched to 91 SoC patients. At 6 months, CRR was higher in the belimumab group (35.9% vs 16.5%, odds ratio [95% CI]: 2.81 [1.30, 6.29], P = 0.005), while response rates at 12 months were similar (P = 0.87). Time-to-CRR was shorter with belimumab (median [interquartile range] 5.64 [4.08, 7.80] vs 7.92 [5.28, 11.04] months, P < 0.01). At CRR, GC dose was lower in the belimumab group (5 [5-15] vs 15 [10-20] mg/day, P = 0.018). Independent predictors of earlier CRR were baseline proteinuria (hazard ratio per g/24 h increase [95% CI]: 0.89 [0.80, 0.98], P = 0.019) and belimumab use (1.70 [1.11, 2.62], P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Early belimumab combination therapy accelerates CRR and reduces GC exposure. Achieving early CRR with lower GC is a key target to limit kidney and GC-related damage, supporting early belimumab integration in LN management.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.