Mesenteric Fat Necrosis Mimicking a Malignant Mesenteric Tumor: A Case Report
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Mesenteric fat necrosis, an uncommon benign condition, can present as a mass-forming lesion and can closely mimic malignant mesenteric disease on imaging. Because its radiologic findings may overlap with those of malignant mesenteric tumors, preoperative diagnosis can be challenging, particularly when tissue sampling is difficult. This report describes a rare case of mesenteric fat necrosis, presenting as an enlarging mesenteric mass suspicious for malignancy. CASE PRESENTATION: F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET, strongly implying a malignant mesenteric tumor, including primary or metastatic mesenteric neoplasms. The biopsy was not feasible because of its deep mesenteric location. Therefore, laparoscopic partial resection of the jejunum containing the mass was performed for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Intraoperatively, a well-circumscribed mass was identified at the mesenteric root of the jejunum. Approximately 30 cm of jejunum was resected. Histopathological examination revealed fibrosis and fat necrosis without malignant features. He recovered uneventfully. No recurrence was observed during 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric fat necrosis can closely mimic malignant mesenteric tumors on multimodality imaging and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of an enlarging mesenteric mass. When biopsy is not feasible, but imaging findings raise concern about malignancy, surgical resection can be a definitive diagnostic and therapeutic option.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Mesenteric Fat Necrosis Mimicking a Malignant Mesenteric Tumor: A Case Report
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Japan Surgical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.