Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke in England and Denmark

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
5Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : dk, es, de, ca, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) can occur following a non-cardioembolic IS (NCIS), despite following secondary prevention guidelines. We quantified recurrent IS risk following discharge from first-ever NCIS in clinical practice. METHODS: Adult patients with first-ever NCIS were identified in England (January 2012-February 2020) and Denmark (January 2012-December 2021) and followed through March 2021 (England) and August 2022 (Denmark). Primary outcome was recurrent IS (incidence rates [IRs] per 100 person years at 12 months and over total follow-up). Cumulative hazard per 100 person years with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated. Stroke severity at index and recurrent IS were compared in Danish patients. RESULTS: Overall, 52,419 English and 62,501 Danish patients were included (respective mean follow-ups: 3.0 and 3.9 years). Recurrent IS events totaled 5857 in England, 9489 in Denmark. IRs/100 person years were similar (England: 3.74 [95% CI 3.64-3.84]; Denmark: 3.87 [95% CI 3.79-3.95]), and highest in the first year (England: 7.39 [95% CI 7.14-7.65]; Denmark: 7.96 [95% CI 7.73-8.20]). Five-year cumulative hazard of recurrent IS was 16.53 (95% CI 16.06-17.01) in England, 18.05 (95% CI 17.64-18.47) in Denmark. Among Danish cases with severity data (n = 5540), versus index strokes, recurrent IS events were more often moderate (13.84% vs 19.01%) or severe (3.57% vs 7.92%). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent IS after NCIS was highest in the first year and remained substantial over 5 years. In Denmark, recurrent IS severity was worse than index events. These findings underscore unmet needs for improved secondary stroke prevention.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke in England and Denmark
Date Crossref
23/05/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.