Spectrum of Vitamin D Deficiency across GFR Levels in a Senegalese Cohort
Résumé fourni par la source
The optimal serum concentration of vitamin D for bone and mineral homeostasis remains debated and few data are available in sub-Saharan Africa. We conducted a cross-sectional study between February 2022 and April 2025 at the Ouakam Military Hospital biochemistry laboratory to assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its relationship with renal function in adults referred for vitamin D testing at a tertiary hospital laboratory in Dakar, Senegal. All patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing serum vitamin D testing were included. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25(OH)-vitamin D < 12 ng/mL, insufficiency as 12 - 19 ng/mL and sufficiency as ≥20 ng/ml. A total of 1192 patients were enrolled (median age 44.0 [31.0 - 62.0] years; M:F ratio 0.8). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency was 15.44% and 22.99%, respectively. Deficient patients exhibited significantly lower serum calcium (p < 0.001). Both pathological fractures (p = 0.54) and kidney dysfunction (p = 0.07) were more frequent in deficient individuals. Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D correlated positively albeit weakly with eGFR (r = 0.10; p < 0.001). More than half (51.2%) of patients with stage 4 - 5 kidney dysfunction had vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency compared with 34.8% of those with preserved renal function. No significant seasonal variation was observed although higher mean levels coincided with sunnier months. Our findings highlight a substantial burden of hypovitaminosis D in Senegal and its association with impaired renal function.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Spectrum of Vitamin D Deficiency across GFR Levels in a Senegalese Cohort
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.