The use of baseline risk in cost-effectiveness modelling of competing interventions.
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives Network meta-analysis (NMA) with individual participant data can estimate how treatment effects change with patient characteristics. Yet cost-effectiveness analyses typically use population-average effects. We introduce a framework that incorporates NMA-derived heterogeneous treatment effects into cost-effectiveness analysis using a risk-modelling approach.Methods We first derived a baseline risk score for each patient using a prognostic model. This risk score was then used as effect modifier in a network meta-regression to estimate risk-specific treatment effects. These effects were incorporated into the cost-effectiveness model to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and net monetary benefits (NMBs) as functions of the baseline risk score. We demonstrated the approach using data from observational and randomized studies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, comparing dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, and placebo.Results Risk-dependent treatment effects from the prediction-NMR framework led to substantial variation in cost-effectiveness across the baseline risk distribution. When these treatment effects were incorporated into the cost-effectiveness model, ICERs increased steadily across baseline risk quintiles, from 48,811 CHF/QALY in the lowest-risk group to 212,870 CHF/QALY in the highest. Dimethyl fumarate has a higher NMB up to a baseline risk of 55%, after which glatiramer acetate becomes the preferred option.Conclusions Our findings show that integrating baseline risk modelling with NMA and cost-effectiveness analysis provides more informative decision-making than relying on average effects. Treatment value can vary substantially across the risk spectrum, indicating that optimal therapy selection is strongly dependent on individual patient risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.