What does psychopathology research have to gain by studying all mental disorders at the same time?

Résumé fourni par la source

The 16 constructive commentaries by De Los Reyes (see record 2027-71300-001), Mansell (see record 2027-71300-002), Keyes (see record 2027-71300-003), Hinshaw (see record 2027-71300-004), Harden (see record 2027-71300-005), Giudice (see record 2027-71300-006), Ehrenreich-May and Milgram (see record 2027-71300-007), Pettersson (see record 2027-71300-008), Atkinson et al. (see record 2027-71300-009), South (see record 2027-71300-010), Zalewski et al. (see record 2027-71300-011), Wilson et al. (see record 2027-71300-012), Tackett and Katz et al. (see record 2027-71300-013), Moriarity and Hanson (see record 2027-71300-014), Dalgleish (see record 2027-71300-015), Raballo et al. (see record 2027-71300-016) about our target article (see record 2026-80066-001) offer fresh ideas, new directions, and research questions. Here we amplify points raised about transdiagnostic approaches to etiology, treatment, and prevention; the role of cognitive ability in studying and treating mental disorders; the need to evaluate generational cohort changes in mental disorders; and the importance of assortative mating in life-course research and in treatment. We conclude by laying out a set of domains that would make sense for developing a p-informed measure of life-course vulnerability to psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).