Visuospatial coding by theta oscillations in human hippocampus
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The hippocampus has been proposed to support visual processing and perception, challenging longstanding accounts that emphasize navigation or declarative memory. A key prediction of visual-processing accounts is that the hippocampus should exhibit similar visuospatial coding properties to those of higher-order visual neocortical areas, such as sensitivity to the size of visual stimuli and contralateral visual field biases. We tested for these properties using intracranial EEG to measure hippocampal neural activity during a retinotopic mapping task. The hippocampus exhibited characteristic slow (∼2 Hz) and fast (∼8 Hz) theta oscillations throughout the task. Fast theta was responsive to the presence but not the amount of visual stimulation. In contrast, slow theta did not generally respond to stimulus presence but scaled with the size of the visual stimulus, consistent with larger receptive fields. Slow theta also showed a contralateral bias, an effect that was specific to the right hippocampus. None of these effects were attributable to microsaccades or performance of the concurrent vigilance task. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence for visual field coding by human hippocampus, supporting accounts of hippocampal function that emphasize its role atop the visual hierarchy. Visual processing of this kind may combine with self-motion, memory, and other signals to support the broader spatial and mnemonic functions with which hippocampal theta oscillations have long been associated.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Visuospatial coding by theta oscillations in human hippocampus
- Date Crossref
- 20/05/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.