Color Trails Test: regression-based norms for Russian-speakers
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: The Color Trails Test (CTT) is widely used across cultures and necessitates culture-relevant norms due to cultural differences in the test performance. However, no norms exist for Russian-speakers. The study aims to: (a) establish regression-based CTT norms for Russian-speaking adults, and (b) compare CTT T-scores for Russian-speakers derived using regression-based norms (RBNs) with the manual norms. METHOD: Community-dwelling healthy Russian-speaking adults were administered the CTT using standard procedures. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to establish RBNs. The participant data were used to calculate two sets of T-scores, using: (a) RBNs and the leave-one-out analysis, and (b) CTT manual norms. These two sets of T-scores were compared by t-test. RESULTS: The mean age of the 196 participants was 37 years [range: 18-86]; 108 (55%) were women, and 102 (52%) had at least university education. CTT completion time was associated with age and education, but not sex. CTT1 T-scores derived from regression-based were higher than manual norms (M difference = 2.39, SD difference = 5.51, p < .001). There was no difference between CTT2 T-scores. Regression-based norms identified fewer participants as performing below average (T ≤36): 7% vs. 18% for CTT1 and 7% vs. 10% for CTT2, p < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed RBNs, developed from a representative sample of Russian-speaking adults, will enhance assessment accuracy and improve diagnostic outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Color Trails Test: regression-based norms for Russian-speakers
- Date Crossref
- 06/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.