Improved prostate cancer prediction by combining Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test results with Genetic Risk Scores (GRS/PRS)
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. The Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) blood test is widely used for prostate cancer detection but suffers from high false-positive rates (up to 80%). Genetic risk scores (GRS/PRS) have a similar performance to PSA testing in predicting prostate cancer risk. Method: GRS269 for prostate cancer was derived using 269 known risk variants and applied to UK Biobank participants. We assessed whether GRS269 improved power to predict prostate cancer diagnosis on top of age and pre-prostatectomy PSA level among 17,380 cases. Longitudinal PSA measurements were processed as median, first, last (most recent), and random PSA. All models were adjusted for age. Results: Across all PSA measures, the integrated model combining GRS269, PSA, and age consistently outperformed models using GRS269 or PSA alone. The highest predictive performance was observed using the last PSA value combined with GRS269 (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.81-0.82), compared to GRS269 alone (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.68-0.72) or PSA alone (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70-0.75). Conclusion: Combining genetic risk with PSA and age improves prostate cancer risk prediction in a population setting. These findings highlight the potential clinical implications of integrating GRS will enhance early prostate cancer prediction pathways in primary care.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Improved prostate cancer prediction by combining Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test results with Genetic Risk Scores (GRS/PRS)
- Date Crossref
- 18/05/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.