Species Diversity and Geographical Distribution of Poultry Ascaridids: A Scoping Review
Rattachement africain : np, no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Poultry nematodes, particularly Ascaridid species, significantly affect avian health and productivity and are widely distributed globally. Yet despite over 80% of poultry in developing countries being raised under extensive rearing systems, knowledge on infection risks posed by different poultry nematodes remains limited. This scoping review synthesizes the knowledge based on the evaluation of existing literature, consolidating insights into the diverse Ascaridid species infecting poultry and their distribution, thereby contributing to the broader comprehension and management of avian nematodes. We found a total of 11 nematode species infecting 8 host types having median prevalence of 24% (IQR: 41.07%–12%). Ascaridia galli and Heterakis gallinarum were the cosmopolitan nematodes reported with median prevalences of 28.75% and 17.20%, respectively. These nematodes almost have a cosmopolitan distribution with a potentiality of transmission between domesticated and across wildlife‐poultry pathways. However, during this scoping review, analysis verifies that six Ascaridia and five Heterakis species are present in chickens worldwide, with Africa and Asia showing a higher prevalence of infection because of adopting long‐standing free‐range poultry farming. The occurrence and diversity of Ascaridid infections in poultry depend on geography, host type, diagnostic methods, and rearing practices, highlighting the need for effective disease management, biosecurity, and control of anthelmintic resistance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Species Diversity and Geographical Distribution of Poultry Ascaridids: A Scoping Review
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.