Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Assessing the Agreement Between Self- and Proxy-Reported Responses for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in People With Dementia Using the Alzheimer’s Disease 5 Dimensions Instrument

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: The level of agreement between utility values derived from self- and proxy reports, assessed using the preference-based health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instrument, the Alzheimer's Disease 5 Dimensions (AD-5D), remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the agreement between self- and proxy-reported HRQoL, measured using the AD-5D, a dementia-specific, preference-based HRQoL instrument. METHODS: The data comprise 77 Australian dyads of people with dementia and their caregivers. The agreement between AD-5D utility values derived from self- and proxy reports was analyzed using a Bland-Altman plot. The ordinary least squares regression technique was used to identify factors associated with the AD-5D utility value sets and to assess agreement between the resulting AD-5D utility values derived from self- and proxy reports. RESULTS: The mean AD-5D utility value derived from self-reports (0.667) was higher than the value derived from proxy reports (0.523). The Bland-Altman plot shows that 7.79% of the differences in AD-5D utility values fell outside the limits of agreement. The regression results indicated that the AD-5D utility value derived from self-reports for people with dementia aged 80 years or older was, on average, 0.20 points lower (β = 0.20, standard error = 0.10) than that for people with dementia aged less than 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Utility values derived from self-reports were higher than those derived from caregiver proxy reports. Although proxy reporting is a necessary alternative when self-reporting is not feasible, these perspectives are not interchangeable. Future economic evaluations should incorporate sensitivity analyses to account for this systematic "proxy gap."

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Assessing the Agreement Between Self- and Proxy-Reported Responses for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in People With Dementia Using the Alzheimer’s Disease 5 Dimensions Instrument
Date Crossref
01/09/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeReliability and Agreement in Measurement

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.