From DES to KiDS: Domain adaptation for cross-survey detection of low-surface-brightness galaxies
Le résumé fourni par la source
Low-surface-brightness galaxies (LSBGs) are vital for understanding galaxy formation, but their diffuse nature makes them challenging to detect. Upcoming large-scale surveys are expected to uncover large numbers of LSBGs, requiring robust automated methods to identify them across heterogeneous datasets. As a precursor to the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) and Euclid, we explore domain adaptation techniques for cross-survey LSBG identification. Using models trained on the Dark Energy Survey (DES), we search for LSBGs in the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 5 (KiDS DR5). We used an ensemble consisting of one convolutional neural network (CNN) and two transformer models trained on DES cutouts and applied to KiDS DR5 imaging data. Structural parameters were estimated with galfitm, and photometric redshifts and stellar population properties were estimated through spectral energy distribution fitting with CIGALE. We identify 20,180 LSBGs and 434 ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in KiDS DR5. Their structural parameters are similar to known LSBGs from DES and the Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey (HSC-SSP). The KiDS-LSBGs follow a continuous size-luminosity relation connecting classical dwarf galaxies and UDGs, and their colours are bimodal ($\sim73\%$ blue, $\sim27\%$ red). Cross-matching with spectroscopic and cluster catalogues provides redshifts for 4,913 systems, enabling a systematic characterisation of the star-forming main sequence of LSBGs. Strong environmental trends are evident, with cluster LSBGs and UDGs exhibiting redder colours and reduced star formation compared to non-cluster systems. We demonstrate that domain adaptation enables robust cross-survey LSBG identification with deep learning models, providing a scalable pathway for constructing homogeneous LSBG catalogues for the LSST and Euclid era.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.