Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 preprint

Disagreement between demultiplexing methods reveals structured cell quality gradients in multiplexed single-cell data

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Single-cell multi-omics profiling of hematopoietic malignancies frequently involves pooling of patient samples before library preparation to reduce costs. Demultiplexing and quality control of the resulting sequencing data depend on experimental design, sequencing depth, and computational methods. Existing approaches benchmark individual tools, auto-select a single best method, or apply majority voting. However, none systematically exploit disagreement patterns among orthogonal strategies as a diagnostic signal for cell quality. Results We introduce Split-flow, a modular Nextflow pipeline that runs hashing-based and SNP-based demultiplexing, and transcriptome-based doublet detection in parallel. It classifies cells into quality strata through a concordance-based decision framework. Validation on multiplexed CITE-seq data from 14 multiple myeloma patients across eight Chromium channels demonstrates high reproducibility and shows that discordant cells cluster within specific cell types and quality strata. TCR clonotype cross-referencing against VDJdb confirms that concordance-based classification enriches for biologically genuine immune receptor sequences, with a 5.3-fold enrichment of confirmed public TCR sequences in the high-confidence stratum. Downsampling analysis reveals that SNP-based methods are more depth-sensitive than hash-based approaches, supporting the recommendation to combine both strategies. The framework transfers to AML samples across three assay types (snMultiome-seq, scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq), where ATAC-based demultiplexing resolves donor assignment discordance under low hashing efficiency. Conclusions Split-flow demonstrates that combining of orthogonal preprocessing methods yields structured information about cell quality and offers a concordance-based framework that transforms this disagreement into a diagnostic signal. It introduces a preprocessing approach that can be exploited beyond hematopoietic malignancies in multiplexed single-cell applications. Graphical abstract Highlights and main findings Introduces Split-flow, a modular Nextflow DSL2 pipeline for preprocessing of multiplexed single-cell multi-omics sequencing data from hematopoietic malignancy samples via a post hoc concordance-based decision framework. Provides practical guidance for the experimental design of multiplexed single-cell multi-omics experiments, including the recommendation to combine antibody-based hashing with a SNP genotype reference for orthogonal demultiplexing. Reveals that SNP-based demultiplexing is more sensitive to sequencing depth than hash-based approaches, and that the combined strategy mitigates depth-dependent biases in cell-type recovery. Demonstrates that disagreement between demultiplexing methods contains structured diagnostic information about cell quality, with concordance categories reflecting genuine quality gradients in multiple myeloma CITE-seq samples. Validates the concordance framework using T cell receptor sequences as an orthogonal biological readout, with a 5.3-fold enrichment of confirmed public TCR sequences in the high-confidence stratum. Applies the preprocessing framework to AML patient samples across three assay types (snMultiome-seq, scRNA-seq, and scATAC-seq) and demonstrates that ATAC-based demultiplexing can resolve donor-assignment discordance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Disagreement between demultiplexing methods reveals structured cell quality gradients in multiplexed single-cell data
Date Crossref
13/05/2026
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • German Cancer Research Center Division of Chromatin Networks pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Heidelberg University Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant) pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University Hospital Heidelberg Department of Internal Medicine V pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Freiburg pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University Hospital Ulm Department of Internal Medicine III pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory Genome Biology Unit pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Hematology/Oncology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Single Cell Open Lab pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center Department of Hematology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Freiburg site of the DKTK consortium pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Division of Chromatin Networks — German Cancer Research Center, Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant) — Heidelberg University et Department of Internal Medicine V — University Hospital Heidelberg, avec 7 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.