Cytomegalovirus infection and coronary artery disease in liver transplant recipients: Nationwide study using protocolized cardiac computed tomography
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Liver transplant recipients have a high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common and is associated with inflammation, possibly promoting atherosclerosis. We investigated if CMV infection is associated with CAD in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: In the Danish Comorbidity in Liver Transplant Recipients (DACOLT) Study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04777032), adult liver transplant recipients underwent research cardiac computed tomography with assessment of CAD and systematic screening for CMV DNAemia. We assessed if prior CMV DNAemia and pre-transplant CMV serostatus were associated with CAD. RESULTS: We included 278 liver transplant recipients, of whom 44% had any calcified plaque (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] ≥1), and 29% had prior CMV DNAemia. The distribution of CACS (P = 0.514) and CAD severity (P = 0.198) did not differ between participants with and without prior CMV DNAemia. Prior CMV DNAemia and positive CMV serostatus were not associated with any calcified plaque (aOR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.36-1.46] and 1.04 [0.55-1.98], respectively) or any measures of CAD after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and time since transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between prior CMV infection and CAD in liver transplant recipients, indicating a limited role on postliver transplantation CAD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cytomegalovirus infection and coronary artery disease in liver transplant recipients: Nationwide study using protocolized cardiac computed tomography
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.