Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Test-retest reliability of endothelial ischemia reperfusion injury in healthy adults

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury (IRI) describes the paradoxical phenomenon through which the restoration of blood flow following prolonged ischemia exacerbates tissue damage during reperfusion. IRI can be experimentally modeled in humans through transient upper-limb ischemia, which temporarily impairs endothelial-dependent vasodilation, as assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. Despite the widespread adoption of this experimental model, its reproducibility has not been established. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of IRI-induced endothelial dysfunction in healthy adults, measured by reductions in FMD (ΔFMD). We hypothesized that IRI would elicit consistent reductions in FMD across two visits. Methods: Eight young, healthy adults (2F/6M, age = 28 ± 7yrs) reported to the lab for two identical experimental visits separated by 2 ± 2 days. Participants were positioned supine and instrumented for measurement of brachial artery FMD at rest and following IRI. IRI was induced via 20-min of upper-arm cuff inflation (250 mmHg) followed by 20-min of reperfusion. Immediately following the reperfusion period, FMD was reassessed. A single unblinded sonographer performed all analyses. Reproducibility of ∆FMD was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; two-way mixed effects, absolute agreement, 2,1 model) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Baseline FMD was similar across visits (Visit 1 Pre-IRI: 6.3 ± 1.6%; Visit 2: Pre-IRI: 6.1 ± 1.9%, P = 0.64) and was reduced following IRI (Visit 1 Post-IRI: 2.7 ± 2.3%; Visit 2 Post-IRI: 2.6 ± 1.8%, P = 0.76). The magnitude of reduction (∆FMD) was consistent between visits (ICC = 0.71 [0.04−0.94], SEM = 1.03%, CV = 17.42%), demonstrating a high degree of reproducibility. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation to establish the reproducibility of endothelial IRI in humans. We demonstrate that IRI reduces brachial artery FMD to a similar extent across multiple study visits. These findings support the use of this experimental model as a reliable method of investigating mechanisms of vascular protection and for testing interventions designed to improve endothelial resilience to IRI-induced impairments in humans. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2026 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Test-retest reliability of endothelial ischemia reperfusion injury in healthy adults
Date Crossref
01/05/2026
Éditeur
American Physiological Society
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.